Legal Opinion

Wilson v. City of Watertown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have granted the motion of defendant, City of Watertown (City), for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff failed to satisfy the statutory condition precedent to maintaining her claim (see, Dobransky v City of Watertown, 168 AD2d 997; Conlon v Village of Pleasantville, 146 AD2d 736). Plaintiff sustained injuries when she fell on an allegedly defective sidewalk in the City of Watertown. Because the City had no written notice of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conlon v. Village of PleasantvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Holt v. County of TiogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Kelly v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Dobransky v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API