Legal Opinion
United States v. Barnard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1958No. Nos. 5786-5789PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Chief Judge.
These four criminal cases present for determination questions of law common to all of them and therefore the cases may be considered together.
In the first case, William Lloyd Barnard, John W. Dailey, Charles W. Humphrey, Donald Henry Smalligan, Peter John Smedes, and Roy Henry Stout were defendants; in the second case, John W. Dailey, Robert E. Lukens, and James F. Bogue were defendants; in the third case, William Lloyd Barnard, Walton H. *585Morse, and Homer A. Kelley were defendants; in the fourth case, Donald Henry Smalligan, Peter John Smedes, and William Lloyd Barnard…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. RaynorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. AlpersSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Yahia Ahmad Joudeh, D/B/A Lincoln Cut Rate Market v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.