Legal Opinion
Karsh v. Haiden
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 4, 1953No. Civ. 15384PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is an action of unfair competition in connection with an agreement transferring a business formerly operated by defendant George P. Haiden with its goodwill and firm name to plaintiffs. All findings were indiscriminately for defendants, and plaintiffs, appealing from the adverse judgment, contend that they are not supported by the evidence, whereas respondents urge that the denial of relief is justified on the facts and that insofar as the findings are unsupported they are not decisive of the dispute and are surplusage.
The following facts are mainly undisputed: In the year 1939 defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Winfield v. CharlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wood v. PefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cohen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Family Record Plan, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Nye v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Demetris v. DemetrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hanover Manufacturing Co. v. Ed Hanover Trailers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.