Legal Opinion
R. T. Stuart & Co. v. Graham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1926No. 16155PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, 0.
This was an action brought by the defendant in error, Roy A. Graham, as plaintiff, against R. T. Stuart & Company, as defendant, to recover damages for the forfeiture of a certain lease to property located on West Grand avenue, Oklahoma City. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff claims to have sustained damages through the alleged wrongful act of the defendant in taking possession of the premises which had been leased to the plaintiff by said defendant and sublet by the plaintiff to the Leipold Grocery & Market Fixture House,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Standard Brewing Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Gordon v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Rider v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Fort Orange Barbering Co. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eason v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Anson v. AnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Woods v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Muir v. McCullahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Holland v. Anderson Bros. CorpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.