Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 6, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from, Linn Ci/rouit Court. Action upon an account for goods and merchandise. There was a judgment upon a verdict against defendant, from which he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

l. Appeal to supreme controversy • jurisdiction, I. The petition declares upon an account, and claims to recover thereon $83. The account' is made an exhibit, which shows certain credits, and that there is a balance due plaintiffs, which they seek to recover in this action. The answer denies “ the correctness of all items charged against defendant,” and alleges that he “ is entitled to a further credit of $125 on account of wood sold.” The answer also pleads the bar of the statute of limitations. It does not set up a counterclaim, and asks no judgment against plaintiff, except for costs.

II.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anchor Milling Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Benttine v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Farnsworth v. CrabbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Stark v. L. Ginsberg & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. McDonald Colliery Co. v. CrottyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API