Legal Opinion

Anchor Milling Co. v. Walsh

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1888PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — IIon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarclay, J.

The petition asserts (in substance) that plaintiff, as operator of a flour mill, engaged the defendant to do the necessary hauling for it at a stipulated price per hundred pounds, payable weekly ; that settlements were made from time to time *288on bills presented as correct by defendant and believed by plaintiff to be so, etc. ; but that plaintiff discovered that they were not correct; that defendant, through mistake or fraud, had been thus overpaid twenty-eight hundred dollars, which had been demanded, etc., and for which judgment is asked.

The answer is a general denial. In the. circuit court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schacker v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Kerr v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Kurtz v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Buckner v. MetzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vanderberg v. Kansas City, Missouri, Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Wilson v. King's Lake Drainage & Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. May v. Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Wilson v. King's Lake Drainage & Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. McGregor v. PollardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API