Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Feder

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabby, J.:

The appellees, as partners in trade under the firm name of H. & G-. Feder, sued appellant at law on the written acceptance of a draft for $358.56. The declaration contains two counts: the first one alleging that plaintiffs sue the defendant, a married woman conducting a mercantile business as a free dealer under the statute of the State of Florida, using the name of Crawford & Co., for that the plaintiffs on the first day of July, 1890, by their draft, directed defendant to pay to the order of G. W. Saxon & Co., for collection, three hundred and fifty-eight and 56-100 dollars at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dollner, Potter & Co. v. SnowSupreme Court of Florida · 1877
  2. Baum v. . MullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. L'Engle v. L'EngleSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
  4. O'Neil v. PercivalSupreme Court of Florida · 1884
  5. Martinez v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Blood v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. AshmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
  4. State Ex Rel. Dillman v. TedderSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. East Coast Stores, Inc. v. Cuthbert Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API