Ramey v. City of Blackfoot
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentShepard, Chief Justice
I feel required to dissent in the instant case because, in my judgment, the majority opinion rejects this Court’s usual standard of review and perhaps makes inoperable or at least curtails Idaho’s detachment statute. I.C. § 50-230.
The court below viewed the premises and its surroundings under the statute which expressly authorizes such procedure. I.C. § 50-229. See also Hammond v. City of Chubbuck, 95 Idaho 618, 515 P.2d 565 (1973); Ball v. Village of Parma, 49 Idaho 40, 286 P. 24 (1930). Based on the testimony and other evidence presented to the trial court and its view of the premises, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Town of Fond Du Lac v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Matter of Estate of WebberIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Ball v. Village of ParmaIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Wolbach v. Village of FlossmoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
- Application of PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.