Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 4, 1935Published

1DissentGantt, J.

(dissenting). — The Commission ruled that the Pipe Line was engaged in intrastate business by selling and distributing industrial gas to consumers both inside and outside the cities of this State. English, C., in concurring, was of the opinion that the facts warranted the ruling on the further ground that the Pipe Line had destroyed the corporate entity of the distributing companies.

Tne majority opinion reverses the judgment of the circuit court affirming the ruling of the Commission. It states that the, Pipe Line admitted that it was a public utility. If so, and it is distributing gas in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API