Legal Opinion
In re: Artem Koshkalda
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2020No. NC-20-1035-GBSUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
FILED JUL 8 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. NC-20-1035-GBS ARTEM KOSHKALDA, Debtor. Bk. No. 3:18-bk-30016-HLB ARTEM KOSHKALDA, Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM* E. LYNN SCHOENMANN, Chapter 7 Trustee; SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION; EPSON AMERICA, INC., Appellees. Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California Hannah L. Blumenstiel, Bankruptcy Judge, Presiding Before: GAN, BRAND, and SPRAKER, Bankruptcy Judges. INTRODUCTION Chapter 71…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kashani v. Fulton (In Re Kashani)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bennett v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.