Legal Opinion

Fertilizing Co. v. . Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover the price of fertilizer goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant in March, 1919, under a contract previously made.

The defendant admitted in his answer that he made the contract, and that "Exhibit A" attached to the complaint is a true copy thereof.

The plaintiff alleged that it delivered to defendant, under the terms of said contract, fertilizer to the value of $2,547.46, nearly all of the fertilizers being bone and Peruvian C. S. M. (cotton seed meal), 8-2-2 goods — that is to say, the guaranteed analysis appearing on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Tomlinson & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Carter v. . McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Allen v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Armour Fertilizer Works v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Godwin v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Godwin v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API