Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 13, 1971No. 70 Civ. 4598PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GURFEIN, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendants for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) F.R.Civ.P. and, alternatively, a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 in that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and there is no triable issue of fact. In the complaint American Cyanamid Company (Cyanamid) charges with breach of contract and unjust enrichment the defendant Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation (Arden), the Executors of the Estate of Elizabeth Arden, deceased, namely, The Bank of New York, J. Howard Carter and Patricia Graham Young, individually and as…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Matter of Complaint Against SeraphimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Prospect Funding Holdings, LLC v. VinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.