Legal Opinion

Rittenhouse Associates, Inc. v. Frederic A. Potts & Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 16, 1977PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

In this litigation involving 'title to an easement and related matters, the Superior Court dismissed the complaint as to defendants Frederic A. Potts and Co., Inc. (Potts), United States Borax & Chemical Corporation (United States Borax), and Van De-mark & Lynch, Inc. (Van Demark) for failure of plaintiff, Rittenhouse Associates, Inc. (Rittenhouse), to comply with discovery orders. That ruling is on appeal here.

I

Superior Court Rule 37(b)(2)(C) authorizes dismissal of an action when the complaining party fails to comply with court-ordered discovery. A default judgment may also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Battaglia v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Gebhart v. Ernest DiSabatino & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Sundor Electric, Inc. v. EJT Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1975

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hoag v. Amex Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Gallagher v. LongSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. In re RinehardtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Pencader Associates, Inc. v. Glasgow TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API