Rittenhouse Associates, Inc. v. Frederic A. Potts & Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
In this litigation involving 'title to an easement and related matters, the Superior Court dismissed the complaint as to defendants Frederic A. Potts and Co., Inc. (Potts), United States Borax & Chemical Corporation (United States Borax), and Van De-mark & Lynch, Inc. (Van Demark) for failure of plaintiff, Rittenhouse Associates, Inc. (Rittenhouse), to comply with discovery orders. That ruling is on appeal here.
I
Superior Court Rule 37(b)(2)(C) authorizes dismissal of an action when the complaining party fails to comply with court-ordered discovery. A default judgment may also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Battaglia v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Gebhart v. Ernest DiSabatino & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Sundor Electric, Inc. v. EJT Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1975
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hoag v. Amex Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Gallagher v. LongSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- In re RinehardtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Pencader Associates, Inc. v. Glasgow TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.