Legal Opinion
Piesco v. New York, Department of Personnel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1987No. 85 Civ. 9893PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Dr. Judith Piesco, brings this action seeking general and punitive damages for the alleged injuries and indignities she sustained as a result of defendants’ conduct. Jurisdiction is predicated under title 28 of the United States Code and principles of pendent jurisdiction. 1 Plaintiff has moved to amend her complaint and to strike one of defendants’ affirmative defenses. Plaintiffs’ motion to amend her complaint is granted. The motion to strike is denied.
BACKGROUND
In 1982, plaintiff was hired by the City as Deputy Personnel Director for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mitchell v. HomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Appletree Square 1 Ltd. Partnership v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Wallin v. Minnesota Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co v. New York City Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Taylor v. Brentwood Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.