Legal Opinion
American Telephone & Telegraph Co v. New York City Department of Human Resources
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1990No. 89 Civ. 4569 (PKL)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
LEISURE, District Judge:
Plaintiff American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT & T”) brought suit against defendants New York City Human Resources Administration (“HRA”) and the City of New York (the “City”) under the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (the “Communications Act”), for long-distance telephone charges allegedly incurred by telephone numbers subscribed to by HRA. Plaintiff AT & T claims that it is owed approximately $529,-000 from HRA for Long Distance Message Telecommunications Services (“LDMTS”) provided by AT & T. Defendants have filed a motion…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Tel. & Tel. v. NYC DEPT. OF HUMAN RES.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Elida Fabain v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Felipe Acevedo v. City of New York, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Felipe Acevedo v. City of New York, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Freud v. The New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.