Lausten v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; R H. Hudson, Judge.. Action by the Union National Bank of Bartlesville against M. C. Lausten and others. Judgment against defendants by default, defendant Lausten’s motion to vacate the judgment denied, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This appeal was prosecuted from an order of the trial court overruling a motion to vacate a judgment that bad been rendered by default upon publication service; the action in which the judgment was passed being upon a promissory note, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage executed to secure the same. The motion was presented at a succeeding term and after the mortgaged land bad been sold under decree < f foreclosure. There were two grounds set up in the motion, as follows :
“(1) To quash and set aside the alleged service of summons, because the said affidavit for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Ogden v. WaltersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Larimer v. KnoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Morse v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Chaplin v. First Bank of HitchcockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Owens v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Jupe v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- United States v. ZuriniDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1950