Legal Opinion
Caly Jiles, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. AU10TIX LTD.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 10, 2026No. 1:24-cv-08122Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CALY JILES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 24 C 8122 v. Hon. LaShonda A. Hunt AU10TIX LTD., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Caly Jiles brings this putative class action against Defendant Au10Tix Ltd. based on its use of Illinois residents’ driver’s licenses and facial geometry in violation of the Illinois Driver’s License Law (“IDLL”),1 625 ILCS 5/6-117.1, and Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), 740 ILCS 14/1-14/99. (Second…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.