Legal Opinion

State v. Schnorr

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1987No. C3-86-2094Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Respondent, Anthony Schnorr, is charged with three felony counts for possession of a controlled substance under Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(2). The State has appealed a pretrial order that suppressed evidence found as a result of an illegal search. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts of this case are set out in State v. Payne, 403 N.W.2d 273 (Minn.Ct.App.1987).

The trial court, following an omnibus hearing, ruled that while the initial stop was lawful, the frisk of Schnorr and his companions violated their fourth amendment rights. As a result, the trial court suppressed evidence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API