Legal Opinion

State v. Payne

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1987No. C1-86-2093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*274OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This is a pretrial appeal by the State from an order suppressing evidence as unconstitutionally obtained. We affirm.

FACTS

The State alleges that in the early morning hours of May 4, 1986, Sergeant Roger Waller of the Duluth Police Department responded to a report of a possible house prowler. The description given was that of a man possibly wearing dark pants or dark sweatpants. Shortly thereafter, he saw three men entering a parked car within 2½ blocks of the location of the reported crime. Sergeant Waller was suspicious because the three wore dark clothing and were in a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. SchnorrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API