Legal Opinion
United States v. William Paul Groomer, United States of America v. Luis Jerome Markovich
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1979No. 78-2429, 78-2487PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants were convicted after separate trials on stipulated facts of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(a)(1), importing a controlled substance (Count I) and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute (Count II). Groomer was convicted as a principal, and Markovich as an aider and abettor, 18 U.S.C. § 2.
Groomer appeals on the ground that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Markovich challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Both appeals were submitted without oral argument and are hereby…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. FlickingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. William Ross PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Tomas Rodriguez v. Clarence JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Richard BeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Sylvia Vasquez-Chan, United States of America v. Julia Gaxiola-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. ZemekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Danilo Bautista Batimana and Jose Edgardo NogueraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.