Legal Opinion

Grubbs v. Crosson

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 11, 1994No. AV93000287PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a boundary line dispute case.

After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court made a determination, establishing the boundary line between the parties.

Henry Grubbs and Lawdean Grubbs appeal the judgment of the trial court. This case is before this court pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 12-2-7(6). This court affirms.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the findings of fact made by the trial court are supported by the evidence.

It is not necessary to set out in detail the facts of this appeal. We do note that both parties have favored this court with excellent briefs, for which we are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lilly v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Grooms v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Moore v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Harmon v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. R.W. v. D.W.W.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ex Parte DWWSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Green v. LeatherwoodCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. T.K.T. v. F.P.T.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. McSween v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API