Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 5, 2003No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ consolidated motion to compel deposition testimony of Donna Erwin [1698-1] and for sanctions under Rule 37(a)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [1698-2], which was filed on January 2, 2003. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motions, defendants’ opposition thereto,1 and the applicable law in this case, the Court finds that plaintiffs’ motions should be granted.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 9, 2002, plaintiffs noticed the depositions of Acting Special Trustee Donna Erwin and Office…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Burlington Insurance v. Okie Dokie, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.