Galimba v. Municipality of Anchorage
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
Raschad Galimba entered a plea of no contest to one count of driving while intoxicated (DWI), a misdemeanor. 1 Galimba now appeals, arguing that field sobriety tests constitute searches under the state and federal constitutions. He contends that District Court Judge Gregory J. Motyka should have suppressed the results of the field sobriety tests in this case (and all other evidence discovered after the tests) because the police did not have a search warrant, and no exception applied. 2 For the reasons set out below, we affirm.
Facts and Proceedings
On October 11, 1998, at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. BernokeitsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Hurlburt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
- Afrand v. FugazziDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.