Legal Opinion

Brownsburg Area Patrons Affecting Change v. Baldwin

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 23, 1996No. IP 96-1357-C H/GPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION .

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Introduction

In Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 96 S.Ct. 612, 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976), the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment imposes significant restrictions on the powers of state and federal government to regulate contributions and expenditures for political purposes. The Supreme Court drew a bright line in Buckley between what it called “express advocacy,” which is speech that uses express words to advocate the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate for office, such as “vote for,” “elect,”…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fort Des Moines Church of Christ v. JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016
  2. Athene Life and Annuity Company v. American General Life Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
  3. BROWNSBURG AREA PATRONS AFFECT. CHANGE v. BaldwinDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API