Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Secretary HHS
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 6, 2007No. 07-2596UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Karen E. Tucker appeals pro se from the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying her application for leave to proceed with her complaint in forma pauperis (“IFP”), without prepayment of fees, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. We will reverse the District Court’s order and remand for further proceedings.
The procedural history of this matter is straightforward. On May 9, 2007, Tucker submitted her complaint along with her IFP application. In her IFP affidavit, she stated that she was unemployed, but between December 2005 and April 2007, she earned $400.00 in…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Roman v. JeffesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Redmond v. GillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Clarence Holiday, in Nos. 18709, 18711, William Holiday, Frank Simmons, Paul Simmons. Appeal of William Holiday, in Nos. 18710, 18712Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
4Cited by1 opinion
- Matheny v. BellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020