Legal Opinion

Garretson v. Brown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1898No. Appeal, No. 365PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 365, Jan. T., 1897, by- plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 8, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1882, No. 709, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Bill in equity by a member oE a firm against bis partners for an account. Exceptions to adjudication. This bill was originally filed against John H. Brown, individually, and as administrator of James W. Brown, deceased, and against Thomas Blakemore.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 365, Jan. T., 1897, by- plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 8, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1882, No. 709, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Bill in equity by a member oE a firm against bis partners for an account. Exceptions to adjudication. This bill was originally filed against John H. Brown, individually, and as administrator of James W. Brown, deceased, and against Thomas Blakemore. The death of John H. Brown, and the appointment of James Stuart Brown, administrator of his estate, was suggested of record on January 16, 1896. The following facts appear from the report of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

The decree of the court below is affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the master’s report.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pottsville Bank v. Minersville Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Borland's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Herron v. HerronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Murphy v. MarvelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API