Herron v. Herron
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 55, April T., 1916, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Allegheny' Co., July T., 1913, No. 1047, on bill in equity in case of James Herron, Administrator d. b. n. c. t. a. of the Estate of James Herron, deceased, v. M. F. Herron. Bill in equity for an accounting. Davis, J., filed the following opinion: FINDINGS OF FACT. From the pleadings and testimony in this casé we find the following facts: First.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 55, April T., 1916, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Allegheny' Co., July T., 1913, No. 1047, on bill in equity in case of James Herron, Administrator d. b. n. c. t. a. of the Estate of James Herron, deceased, v. M. F. Herron. Bill in equity for an accounting. Davis, J., filed the following opinion: FINDINGS OF FACT. From the pleadings and testimony in this casé we find the following facts: First. That Moses F. Herron, the defendant, and James Herron were for a number of years engaged in the grain and feed business at No. 1019 Liberty street, City of Pittsburgh, under the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Williams, J.,
The administrator of a deceased member of a firm brought suit against the survivor for an accounting. It appears that James Herron and M. F. Herron were copartners, trading as M. F. Herron & Co.; that the partnership was dissolved in 1895 by the death of James Herron; that M. F. Herron, after his release from an insane asylum in 1895, received from his committee $1,895.82 as the assets of the firm; that James Herron was, when he died, indebted to the firm in the sum of $8,099.59. In July, 1897, M. F. Herron was compelled to pay a part*574nership debt of $8,150. This he did…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hurst v. BrennenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Everhart's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Tully v. FeltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Hamilton v. Hamilton's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
- Lowenstein v. BacheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schantz v. ClemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946