Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dillon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 1, 1792PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 116 (____)

4 Dall. 116

The Commonwealth

versus

Dillon.[(1)]

Supreme Court of United States.

For the Commonwealth, Ingersoll, attorney-general.

For the Prisoner, Sergeant and Todd.

By the COURT:

The fact of the arson is established; and it only remains to decide, whether it was committed by the prisoner? The proof against him, depends upon his own confession, slightly corroborated by the testimony of two witnesses. The confession was freely and voluntarily made, was fairly and openly received, before the mayor; and, therefore, it was regularly read in evidence. But still, it has been urged, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eddowes v. NiellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1793

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. Fife, Jones & Stewart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. Dennis v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API