Legal Opinion

Young v. General American Life Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1941No. 412PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Miami County, Ohio.

The trial court sustained defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition and the plaintiff, not desiring to plead further, dismissed the action on the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action.

Within statutory time plaintiff perfected his appeal to this Court. The sole and only question for our determination is the sufficiency of plaintiff’s petition. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emerick v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Hinkler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. John Hancock Mut Life Ins v. Gwinn Milling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Aetna Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Landorf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Landorf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Paul Revere Life Insurance v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Juhl v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API