Legal Opinion

Juhl v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1951No. Civ. 18451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover death benefits under a certificate of insurance defendant appeals.

There is no dispute as to the facts. The certificate of insurance was on the life of George Juhl and was issued under and subject to the terms of a group insurance policy issued to Walter B. Bowie, his employer. Juhl’s wife, plaintiff herein, was named as beneficiary. The certificate and the group in surance policy were both in effect on December 31, 1946, at which time Juhl terminated his employment with Walter Bowie. .Both the certificate 1 and the group policy 2…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Emerick v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Adkins v. Aetna Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Cutledge v. Ætna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Szymanski v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Billie J. Preaseau v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Wells v. Wilbur B. Driver Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API