Legal Opinion
Sare v. Central Collection Unit
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 6, 2025No. 8:24-cv-03637Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND HADAROU SARE, Plaintiff, v. Civil No.: 8:24-cv-03637-JRR CENTRAL COLLECTION UNIT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the court on pro se Plaintiff Hadarou Sare’s “Motion to Reopen Case” (ECF No. 34; the “Motion”), which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59(e). The court has reviewed all papers; no hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2025). I. Background On December 16, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this action against Defendants Central Collection Unit, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Hutchinson v. StatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Mayfield v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Herman T. DOVE, Appellant, v. CODESCO, Formerly Known as Washington Dental Supply Company, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.