Legal Opinion

Downey v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 1992No. 28139-9-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

Miriam Downey appeals the Superior Court's grant of summary judgment affirming a Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals ruling that the Department of Labor and Industries (hereinafter Department) has a right to reimbursement against her loss of consortium recovery, thus offsetting her surviving spouse pension benefits. We affirm.

The parties have stipulated to all relevant facts. Miriam Downey's husband contracted asbestosis through his employment and thereby received workers' compensation benefits pursuant to RCW Title 51. Both husband and wife then sued several third parties pursuant to RCW…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Clark v. PacificorpWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lund v. CapleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. West v. ZeibellWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Christie v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tallerday v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Mills v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API