Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrews
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 3, 1978No. Crim. 7-80096PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF THE INDICTMENT
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
Defendants Thurston Brooks and Tallice Andrews are charged in a three count superseding indictment with conspiracy, possession with intent to distribute heroin and unlawfully carrying a firearm during the commission of a felony. They have filed numerous pre-trial motions. The Court is here concerned only with the defendants’ motion to dismiss Count I of the indictment.
The defendants contend that Count I of the superseding indictment, the conspiracy count, should be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Tallice Andrews and Thurston BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- State v. MoritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- United States v. Tallice Andrews and Thurston BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Walter J. Lovett, Jr. v. Fred Butterworth, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at WalpoleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.