Legal Opinion

Watson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1961No. Nos. 14192, 14193PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Chief Judge.

These are appeals by Harry Watson and Maggie Watson, husband and wife, from judgments of the district court in consolidated personal injury cases arising out of a collision between an automobile and a diesel switching engine of defendant railroad. The court directed the jury to return a verdict of no cause of action in the husband’s case. The wife’s case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict of no cause of action. Harry Watson appeals on the ground that the court erred in directing a verdict because, as he contends, the controlling issue was one of fact…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. AckersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maggie Watson v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Virginia Corporation, Harry Watson v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API