Legal Opinion

Maggie Watson v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Virginia Corporation, Harry Watson v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Virginia Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1961No. 14193Published

1Opinion of the Court

287 F.2d 662

Maggie WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, a Virginia Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Harry WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, a Virginia Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 14192, 14193.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 14, 1961.

Norman A. Gottieb, Flint, Mich., for appellants, Pelavin & Gottlieb, Flint, Mich., on the brief.

Robert A. Straub, Detroit, Mich., for appellee, Robert B. Seeley, Detroit, Mich., and Gault, Davison & Bowers, Flint, Mich., on the brief.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MILLER…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. AckersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  2. Watson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API