Cullison v. Medley
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Dan Cullison . (Culli-son) appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant appellees Ernest, Doris, Ron, and Sandy Medley and Terry Simmons (collectively, "'the Medleys"). We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the impact rule prohibits Culli-son from recovering for his claimed emo- . tional distress resulting from the Medleys' alleged wrongdoings.
FACTS
The facts of this case are largely undisputed. On February 2, 1986 thirty-four year old Cullison encountered Sandy, the sixteen year old daughter of Ernest, in a shopping center parking lot.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- FMC Corp. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- FMC Corp. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sigsbee v. SwathwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Moffett v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cullison v. MedleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Conwell v. BeattyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Eakin v. KumiegaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cullison v. MedleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.