Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reginelli v. Marcellus Boggs, M.D., Monongahela Valley Hosp., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 2018No. 20 WAP 2016; No. 22 WAP 2016; No. 21 WAP 2016; No. 23 WAP 2016Published

1DissentJustice Wecht

To ensure frank, probing assessments of physicians by their peers-those most qualified to conduct such reviews-our General Assembly enacted the Peer Review Protection Act ("the PRPA" or "the Act").1 The Act protects a host of records associated with peer review from discovery in malpractice litigation, where the disclosure of such records might discourage candid and effective peer review. The Act is not a model of clarity. That lack of clarity prompts me to dissent respectfully from the Majority's holding.

At issue in this case2 is whether Monongahela Valley Hospital ("MVH") and *309UPMC Emergency…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Robinson v. MagovernDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API