Reginelli v. Marcellus Boggs, M.D., Monongahela Valley Hosp., Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Wecht
To ensure frank, probing assessments of physicians by their peers-those most qualified to conduct such reviews-our General Assembly enacted the Peer Review Protection Act ("the PRPA" or "the Act").1 The Act protects a host of records associated with peer review from discovery in malpractice litigation, where the disclosure of such records might discourage candid and effective peer review. The Act is not a model of clarity. That lack of clarity prompts me to dissent respectfully from the Majority's holding.
At issue in this case2 is whether Monongahela Valley Hospital ("MVH") and *309UPMC Emergency…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Robinson v. MagovernDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.