Legal Opinion

Gary C. Dickens & Antwarn D. Fenner v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2017No. 14-CF-331 & 14-CF-425PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Separate statement of Associate Judge FISHER at page 818.

Fisher, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellants Antwarn Fenner and Gary Dickens of first-degree murder while armed 1 and conspiracy to commit the same. 2 Mr. Fenner argues that the trial -court committed reversible error when it instructed the jury on the principles of aiding and abetting and when it struck a small portion of his closing argument. Mr. Dickens argues that he should receive a new trial under Super. Ct. Crim. R. 33 and the doctrine of Brady v. Mary land 3 due to the government’s alleged failure to disclose a statement…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Binion v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Fenner v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Fleming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Rezene v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. Robin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API