Gary C. Dickens & Antwarn D. Fenner v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Separate statement of Associate Judge FISHER at page 818.
Fisher, Associate Judge:
A jury convicted appellants Antwarn Fenner and Gary Dickens of first-degree murder while armed 1 and conspiracy to commit the same. 2 Mr. Fenner argues that the trial -court committed reversible error when it instructed the jury on the principles of aiding and abetting and when it struck a small portion of his closing argument. Mr. Dickens argues that he should receive a new trial under Super. Ct. Crim. R. 33 and the doctrine of Brady v. Mary land 3 due to the government’s alleged failure to disclose a statement…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Binion v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Fenner v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Fleming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Rezene v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Robin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.