Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of George P. Gurley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1931No. 28,613PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Proceeding by the state board of law examiners for the discipline of George P. Gurley, an attorney at law, who has answered. The facts have been stipulated.

In October, 1927, counsel was employed by a client to purchase for her a certain promissory note and real estate mortgage securing the same on North Dakota land and upon which there was unpaid the sum of $423.40. The papers were im the hands of a firm of lawyers in North Dakota representing the owner. Counsel phoned to the North Dakota lawyers, and it was agreed that the mortgage would be bought by his client. He thereupon wrote the North…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re Disbarment of I. A. ChmelikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Barrett v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. In Re Disbarment of A. M. BredingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. In Re Discipline of Douglas LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API