Legal Opinion

Barrett v. City of Virginia

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1929No. 27,629PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

After verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.

While crossing one of the streets of defendant city on a paved crosswalk December 22, 1928, plaintiff fell and was injured. The verdict implies a jury finding that defendant was negligent. There had been enough of a snowfall so that shortly before the accident the city’s snowplows had been run over both streets and sidewalks at the intersection in question. At this corner, the evidence for plaintiff is that the snow had been ^artificially accumulated by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hillstrom v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. In Re Disbarment of George P. GurleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Moran v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Callahan v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Mathieson v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Larson v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Martin v. City of OpelousasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API