Harvey v. Pinkerton & Wilson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. J. H. Apple-gate, Judge. Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the district court, overruling a motion to apportion costs.—
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The question we are required to determine is stated in the certificate of the trial judge as follows: “Where, as in this case, the plaintiffs brought their action in replevin to recover the possession of the property in controversy from the defend-: ants, who held the property, at the commencement of the suit, under a chattel mortgage executed by the plaintiffs to the defendants to secure the payment of about three thousand doHars, evidenced by notes, being part of the purchase price for the property in controversy, in which action the plaintiffs, while admitting the execution of the notes,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peck v. BonebrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- McIntire v. EastmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Upson v. FullerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Gravel v. CloughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Bush v. YeomanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richards v. W. H. Hellen & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Harward v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- C. I. T. Corp. v. FurrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940