Legal Opinion

Small v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 23, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Principal and surety. Homestead. "Waiver. Interest and usury. Yerdict. Before Judge Gustin. Crawford superior court. April term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

Small sued Hicks and Walker upon a promissory note. Hicks pleaded usury, and Walker pleaded that he was a mere security on the note, and that at the time he became security, it was understood and agreed between the parties that Hicks should give Small a mortgage, with waiver of homestead and exemption, upon certain mules and a wagon, to secure the payment of the note; that the mortgage was accordingly given, but that in taking the mortgage, Small took more than the lawful rate of interest from Hicks, and thereby rendered the security valueless and the homestead waiver of no…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ryner v. DukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Turner v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Ward v. McLambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Lowry v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. McWhorter v. SwilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API