Thomco Realty, Inc. v. Helms
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Judge.
Defendants now argue that the handwritten document dated 3 September 1985 was patently ambiguous, creating no contractual relations between plaintiff and defendant. Therefore, defendants contend the trial court erred when it considered materials from affidavits and depositions to explain any ambiguities and entered summary judgment for plaintiff pursuant to the terms of this document. We disagree and uphold the decision of the trial court.
Summary judgment should be rendered only when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and affidavits disclose no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Williamson v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Town of West Jefferson v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alchemy Communications Corp. v. Preston Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- AUGUSTA HOMES, INC. v. FeuersteinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Alchemy Communications Corp. v. Preston Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- BONE v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. GaydosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.