Legal Opinion
McQueen v. Woodstream Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 10, 2007No. Civil Action No. 05-2068PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for a More Definite Statement Regarding the Plaintiff’s Fraud Claim; Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Breach of Contract Claim
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the court is the preliminary question, raised sua sponte, of whether the District of Columbia is an appropriate venue for this case. Also pending is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint alleging breach of implied contract and fraudulent misrepresentation.
Because the defendant, a Pennsylvania company, initiated…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kemp v. EilandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kettey v. Saudi Ministry of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Taylor v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Stephens v. US Airways GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.