Legal Opinion

Condon v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Houghton. (Steere, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

The plaintiff shipped goods from New York by the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, directed to himself at Hancock, Michigan, and they were carried in succession by connecting carriers until they were delivered by the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company to defendant at Negaunee on March 12, 1883. The goods were carried by defendant over its road to L’Anse, where they arrived March 13, 1883, and were placed in defendant’s warehouse. There they remained until March 20, 1883, when they were destroyed by an accidental fire. L’Anse was the terminus of railroad transportation.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Brintnall v. Saratoga & Whitehall RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  3. McDonald v. . Western Railroad CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Mills v. . the Michigan Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Conkey v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ReissSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Bennitt v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Bosworth v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API