Legal Opinion

Boddy v. Jannini

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 31, 2007Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

After a jury-waived trial of this summary process action, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff-landlord for possession of the commercial premises occupied by the defendant. The defendant, proceeding pro se, appealed on the grounds that (1) the plaintiff was not the proper party to bring this action, and (2) a finding that the plaintiff violated G.L.c. 93A should have been made in the defendant’s favor.

The evidence presented at trial established that William Boddy (“Boddy”) purchased property in North Andover, Massachusetts (“the property”) in 1984, and developed the property in 1985…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wayne Investment Corp. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  2. Metropolitan Credit Union v. MatthesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. LAS Collection Management v. PaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. GeorgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Taveras v. RodriquezMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API