Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Credit Union v. Matthes

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 16, 1999No. 96-P-1306PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

The defendants, Raymond and Sherry Matthes, who are husband and wife, appeal from a judgment of summary process for the plaintiff, Metropolitan Credit Union (Credit Union), pursuant to the Credit Union’s motion for summary judgment. The Housing Court judge, sitting in Superior Court, also granted the Credit Union’s motion for summary judgment on the Mattheses’ counterclaims for breach of contract, wrongful foreclosure, and violation of G. L. c. 93A.

1. Factual background. The undisputed but convoluted facts are as follows. In November, 1987, Raymond and Sherry Matthes obtained a $25,000 line…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Paul J. Grella, Trustee v. Salem Five Cent Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Loring v. MercierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Gray v. GirouxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. GabrielMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  4. Wilder v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERICAS CORP.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Weber v. Coast to Coast Medical, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API