Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 3, 1934No. 13914 and 13983Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

Mr. Acting Associate Justice Ramage.

This was a rehearing in the above case, ordered by the Court.

The petition for rehearing, among other things, challenges the right of this Court to increase the amount of the verdict found by the jury. It is due to the writer of the original opinion to say that he was led by the brief of the appellants’ attorneys to understand that if the judgment was affirmed the plaintiff was entitled to recover all that he asked for, to wit, $24,091.89, instead of the $18,091.89, found by the jury. It is alleged now, by the petition for rehearing, that the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Cook & Laurie Contracting Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Schultz v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hall v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance v. LinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API