Legal Opinion

Comcast of California I, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 5, 2005No. C 05-00824WHAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this action under the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. 521, et seq., plaintiffs Comcast of California I, Inc., and Comcast of California/Massachusetts/Michigan/Utah, Inc., who hold expired cable franchises, move for a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant City of Walnut Creek from conditioning the issuance of construction permits for a system upgrade upon finalization of a renewal franchise agreement.

STATEMENT

1. Comcast’s Cable Franchises with Walnut Creek.

Plaintiffs are late-comers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Charter Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Charter Communications Properties, LLC Paul G. Allen v. County of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Charter Communications, Inc. v. County of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Walnut CreekDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  2. City of Detroit v. MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API