Legal Opinion
City of Detroit v. Michigan
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 10, 2012No. Case No. 10-12427Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BRIEFING
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
The City of Detroit has sued defendant Comcast of Detroit, the City’s cable television provider, seeking to enforce the terms of the latest negotiated franchise agreement between Comcast and the City, which expired on February 28, 2007. The City contends that Comcast is a holdover tenant, and it must comply with all the terms of the expired agreement. Comcast maintains that it is operating under a new agreement that took effect by…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.